Loading concentration considerations when migrating Illumina libraries between sequencing platforms

Due to differences in chemistry and hardware, libraries exhibit different clustering efficiencies on different Illumina sequencing platforms. Migrating libraries between platforms requires instrument-specific optimization of cluster density.

Listed are guidelines for determining the loading concentration of a library that is being migrated to a different Illumina sequencing platform:

  • Between MiniSeq and NextSeq 500/550 platforms

    • The MiniSeq and NextSeq 500/550 platforms use similar chemistries for cluster generation. As a result, the same library can be expected to cluster at a similar density.

  • Between MiSeq and MiniSeq/NextSeq 500/550 platforms

    • The MiniSeq and NextSeq 500/550 platforms require significantly lower cluster densities than the MiSeq platform. Therefore, it is important to redo cluster density optimization when migrating a library from MiSeq to MiniSeq or NextSeq 500/550 platform and vice versa.

  • From iSeq 100 to NovaSeq 6000

  • From NovaSeq 6000 to NovaSeq X Series

    • For transitioning projects from the NovaSeq 6000 System to the NovaSeq X Series, center titrations at ~30% of the NovaSeq 6000 System loading concentration for the standard onboard clustering workflow. See Maximizing performance on the NovaSeq X Series for more information.

  • From MiSeq to MiSeq i100

For further guidance on library loading concentrations across Illumina systems, refer to the PhiX loading concentrations for validation runs on Illumina sequencing platforms article.

For any feedback or questions regarding this article (Illumina Knowledge Article #1509), contact Illumina Technical Support [email protected].

Last updated

Was this helpful?